In response to rapidly rising social inflation and insurance premiums, Florida passed new tort reform legislation in late 2022 (Senate Bill 2-A) and early 2023 (House Bill 837). The changes impact property and casualty lines to help level the playing field between plaintiffs, defendants, and insurers.
1. Assignment of Benefits
Problem: Insureds assigned their insurance benefits to contractors who fixed the property and then filed a claim with the insurance company, leading to inflated costs, unnecessary repairs, and the inability of insurers to recommend repair contractors.
Reform: Policyholders can no longer assign their insurance benefits to contractors.
2. One Way Prevailing Party Attorney Fees
Problem: Plaintiff attorneys could recover their fees from insurers if the judgment was more than the insurer’s initial offer to settle, which impeded settlement and incentivized plaintiff attorneys to go to trial.
Reform: Plaintiff attorneys no longer recover their fees in this scenario.
1. Comparative Fault
Problem: Plaintiffs could recover damages from defendants, even when the plaintiff was mostly at fault.
Reform: A change of standard from pure comparative negligence to modified comparative negligence, meaning plaintiffs no longer recover damages when apportioned >50% of fault by juries.
2. Property Owner Liability
Problem: Property owners were being held fully liable for injuries to tenants, guests, and even those on the property to commit crimes.
Reform: Fault is now apportioned between all parties contributing to the injury, and property owners owe no duty to criminal actors.
3. Statute of Limitations
Problem: Four year statute of limitation for negligence claims.
Reform: New two-year statute of limitations encourages plaintiffs to file earlier and allows defendants (and insurers) to gather evidence closer to the time of the event. This will likely reduce the number of frivolous claims and procedural delays.
4. Phantom Damages
Problem: Plaintiffs could recover for all medical services billed, whether or not those bills were ultimately paid by the plaintiff or their health insurance.
Reform: Plaintiffs can no longer receive awards for damages billed but never actually paid.
5. Plaintiff Attorney Fee Multipliers
Problem: Plaintiff attorneys were regularly awarded additional fees by the court beyond their contingency fee arrangement with their client.
Reform: There is now a presumption that the standard fee is sufficient, and can only be overcome in exceptional circumstances.
6. Bad Faith Claims
Problem: Plaintiff attorneys had no independent duty to act in good faith.
Reforms:
a) Plaintiff attorneys and defendants/insurers now have separate, independent duties to act in good faith to each other when providing information, making demands, setting deadlines, and attempting to settle claims.
b) Negligence alone is no longer sufficient to constitute bad faith by insurers.
c) Insurers have 90-day “safe harbor” periods after receiving a demand and supporting evidence, during which no bad faith action can be brought just because the insurer tenders less than the amount demanded by the plaintiff.
d) Insurers can avoid excess of policy limits exposure or extra contractual obligations if they deposit limits with the court for apportionment.
The changes have helped Florida’s insurance market.
The reforms have restored some balance to the litigation landscape, and Florida’s insurers and policyholders are reaping the benefits.
To discuss further, contact Frank DeMento (fdemento@transre.com) or Bryan McCarthy (bmccarthy@transre.com).
The material contained in this memorandum has been prepared by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company (“TransRe”) and is for general informational purposes only. All information is provided in good faith, however TransRe makes no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, or completeness of the information provided. This memorandum is the confidential and proprietary work product of TransRe and is not to be distributed to any third party without the written consent of TransRe.
The Best’s Company Report(s) reproduced on this site appear under license from A.M. Best and do not constitute, either expressly or implied, an endorsement of (Licensee)’s products or services. A.M. Best is not responsible for transcription errors made in presenting Best’s Company Reports. Best’s Company Reports are copyright © A.M. Best Company and may not be reproduced or distributed without the express written permission of A.M. Best Company. Visitors to this web site are authorized to print a single copy of the Best’s Company Report(s) displayed here for their own personal use. Any other printing, copying or distribution is strictly prohibited.
Best’s Ratings are under continuous review and subject to change and/or affirmation. To confirm the current rating, please visit the AM Best web site, www.ambest.com.